So sounds like OU & Texas are as good as done for the SEC. B1G's gotta be the next big domino to fall now. I don't think they care about much of the Big 12. I think they'll try to expand to 16 but if they take anyone from the Big 12, I think it'll be Kansas for the KC market. I think they're more likely to poach from the ACC or Pac 12.
So sounds like OU & Texas are as good as done for the SEC. B1G's gotta be the next big domino to fall now. I don't think they care about much of the Big 12. I think they'll try to expand to 16 but if they take anyone from the Big 12, I think it'll be Kansas for the KC market. I think they're more likely to poach from the ACC or Pac 12.
Probably take another swing at Notre Dame first.
Are they still holding to that Land Grant colleges only standard?
So sounds like OU & Texas are as good as done for the SEC. B1G's gotta be the next big domino to fall now. I don't think they care about much of the Big 12. I think they'll try to expand to 16 but if they take anyone from the Big 12, I think it'll be Kansas for the KC market. I think they're more likely to poach from the ACC or Pac 12.
Probably take another swing at Notre Dame first.
Are they still holding to that Land Grant colleges only standard?
I didn’t know that was a standard for them. Yes notre dame will be approached. The one I’ve seen in a couple spots that I think makes a lot of sense is Georgia Tech.
Are they still holding to that Land Grant colleges only standard?
I didn’t know that was a standard for them. Yes notre dame will be approached. The one I’ve seen in a couple spots that I think makes a lot of sense is Georgia Tech.
I'm sure that I've seen that used as a reason to keep schools out before...."But they are not a land-grant university"
Maybe Penn State used that against Pitt? It's definitely something that I've seen mentioned.