Kingsbury might go back for Spurrieresque reasons. Last couple of times i've seen him on the sidelines he's showing the NFL head coach wear & tear. He seems like a guy who would not accept the transition to ugly old man.
speaking from experience, to state the obvious.
JJ Watt was openly mocking this on Twitter.
I do enjoy the absolute wacko scenario that Herbstreit put out there. I honestly have no idea. Wake or Pitt might have an argument.
Wake lost to UNC and got throttled by Clemson. Pitt lost to Western Michigan and Miami. Nope.
In the end there was virtually no chaos for the College Football Playoff. Easy task for the committee.
However, imagine if Michigan State does not lose to Purdue. In that instance, there is a 3-way tie in the Big Ten East and Ohio State goes to the Big 10 Championship game.
If Ohio State beats Iowa, and everything else stays the same, I have no idea which 4 team the committee would pick in that scenario.
In the end there was virtually no chaos for the College Football Playoff. Easy task for the committee.
However, imagine if Michigan State does not lose to Purdue. In that instance, there is a 3-way tie in the Big Ten East and Ohio State goes to the Big 10 Championship game.
If Ohio State beats Iowa, and everything else stays the same, I have no idea which 4 team the committee would pick in that scenario.
In the end there was virtually no chaos for the College Football Playoff. Easy task for the committee.
However, imagine if Michigan State does not lose to Purdue. In that instance, there is a 3-way tie in the Big Ten East and Ohio State goes to the Big 10 Championship game.
If Ohio State beats Iowa, and everything else stays the same, I have no idea which 4 team the committee would pick in that scenario.
In the end there was virtually no chaos for the College Football Playoff. Easy task for the committee.
However, imagine if Michigan State does not lose to Purdue. In that instance, there is a 3-way tie in the Big Ten East and Ohio State goes to the Big 10 Championship game.
If Ohio State beats Iowa, and everything else stays the same, I have no idea which 4 team the committee would pick in that scenario.
How does tosu get the tie breaker?
I think it would be based on tiebreaker 5:
The records of the three (or more) teams will be compared based on the best cumulative conference winning percentage of non-divisional opponents.
In the end there was virtually no chaos for the College Football Playoff. Easy task for the committee.
However, imagine if Michigan State does not lose to Purdue. In that instance, there is a 3-way tie in the Big Ten East and Ohio State goes to the Big 10 Championship game.
If Ohio State beats Iowa, and everything else stays the same, I have no idea which 4 team the committee would pick in that scenario.
Can you not with the Ohio State shit please?
It always seems to work out after all the games are played, but the rankings throughout the second half of the season give us something to talk about and get mad over week to week. Kind of like RF's old weekly worst person on earth rankings.
I did see someone bring up how the LSU/Alabama rematch brought about the CFP and how a Georgia/Alabama rematch could bring about playoff expansion. I'm really hoping for one of them to lose in the semifinals so that we don't get a rematch. I do think there's a good chance Michigan beats Georgia, but I can't see Cincy beating Alabama.
It always seems to work out after all the games are played, but the rankings throughout the second half of the season give us something to talk about and get mad over week to week. Kind of like RF's old weekly worst person on earth rankings.
I did see someone bring up how the LSU/Alabama rematch brought about the CFP and how a Georgia/Alabama rematch could bring about playoff expansion. I'm really hoping for one of them to lose in the semifinals so that we don't get a rematch. I do think there's a good chance Michigan beats Georgia, but I can't see Cincy beating Alabama.
Serious question. Do you think a 12 team playoff is a better option than the current system? I say no.
It always seems to work out after all the games are played, but the rankings throughout the second half of the season give us something to talk about and get mad over week to week. Kind of like RF's old weekly worst person on earth rankings.
I did see someone bring up how the LSU/Alabama rematch brought about the CFP and how a Georgia/Alabama rematch could bring about playoff expansion. I'm really hoping for one of them to lose in the semifinals so that we don't get a rematch. I do think there's a good chance Michigan beats Georgia, but I can't see Cincy beating Alabama.
Serious question. Do you think a 12 team playoff is a better option than the current system? I say no.
I think teams like Baylor, Utah, and Pitt should get a chance to show what they can do after winning conference titles.
Serious question. Do you think a 12 team playoff is a better option than the current system? I say no.
I think teams like Baylor, Utah, and Pitt should get a chance to show what they can do after winning conference titles.
Utah lost 3 games. No one thinks they are a top-4 team, and their winning of the conference demonstrates why conference champions should not receive byes as one of the proposals for the 12-team playoff proposes.
It always seems to work out after all the games are played, but the rankings throughout the second half of the season give us something to talk about and get mad over week to week. Kind of like RF's old weekly worst person on earth rankings.
I did see someone bring up how the LSU/Alabama rematch brought about the CFP and how a Georgia/Alabama rematch could bring about playoff expansion. I'm really hoping for one of them to lose in the semifinals so that we don't get a rematch. I do think there's a good chance Michigan beats Georgia, but I can't see Cincy beating Alabama.
Serious question. Do you think a 12 team playoff is a better option than the current system? I say no.
I think 12 would be great. 4 weeks, 4 byes, run it through traditional bowl season. What's not to love, the devaluation of the regular season? I think it would still be massively important to get the bye and only have to play 3 games. Players getting paid now so no teeth to the "too many games for student athletes" argument. Also having just 4 byes for conference champs gives 1 conference a fun disrespect angle (spoiler: it's the pac12)
Serious question. Do you think a 12 team playoff is a better option than the current system? I say no.
I think 12 would be great. 4 weeks, 4 byes, run it through traditional bowl season. What's not to love, the devaluation of the regular season? I think it would still be massively important to get the bye and only have to play 3 games. Players getting paid now so no teeth to the "too many games for student athletes" argument. Also having just 4 byes for conference champs gives 1 conference a fun disrespect angle (spoiler: it's the pac12)
