Wait, Rittenhouse is going to go to ASU? Balls might be right about "he's going to get so much puss" theory.
Well he is a violent blood-thirsty murderer, after all. If he can't get puss, what hope is there for any of us?
I shouldn't care, but the predictable reaction by people doubling down on their anti-Rittenhouse takes might be the media/Twitter narrative that has bothered me the most of anything I can recall. It's perfectly normal to say he never should have been out there in the first place (even though it completely ignores the fact that neither should the fucking people he shot), and reasonable people can disagree about whether or not it should be legal to walk around the streets with a semi-automatic rifle. You're even entitled to think he was "looking for trouble" or whatever, even though it's total speculation and there's no way anyone can ever possibly know the truth of that.
But if you paid even the barest amount of attention to the trial, watched the videos of what happened and heard the tesitmony of the dude he shot and didn't kill, and you still insist on calling it "murder" then you are not a serious person. You made up your mind a year ago and no amount of evidence could ever convince you of something that is glaringly obvious from the videos - he only pulled the trigger when he felt he no longer had a choice.
And the racism angle just puts the cherry on top of the whole thing for me. If you say any version of, "If Kyle Rittenhouse were black..." I'm automatically ignoring whatever comes next. These people do not want "justice" for black people; they want injustice for white people. You are quite literally wishing that Rittenhouse were either killed on the scene or found guilty in spite of clear evidence of self-defense. For what? Because you think that's what would have happened to someone else? That doesn't fix a goddamn thing.
Wait, Rittenhouse is going to go to ASU? Balls might be right about "he's going to get so much puss" theory.
Well he is a violent blood-thirsty murderer, after all. If he can't get puss, what hope is there for any of us?
I shouldn't care, but the predictable reaction by people doubling down on their anti-Rittenhouse takes might be the media/Twitter narrative that has bothered me the most of anything I can recall. It's perfectly normal to say he never should have been out there in the first place (even though it completely ignores the fact that neither should the fucking people he shot), and reasonable people can disagree about whether or not it should be legal to walk around the streets with a semi-automatic rifle. You're even entitled to think he was "looking for trouble" or whatever, even though it's total speculation and there's no way anyone can ever possibly know the truth of that.
But if you paid even the barest amount of attention to the trial, watched the videos of what happened and heard the tesitmony of the dude he shot and didn't kill, and you still insist on calling it "murder" then you are not a serious person. You made up your mind a year ago and no amount of evidence could ever convince you of something that is glaringly obvious from the videos - he only pulled the trigger when he felt he no longer had a choice.
And the racism angle just puts the cherry on top of the whole thing for me. If you say any version of, "If Kyle Rittenhouse were black..." I'm automatically ignoring whatever comes next. These people do not want "justice" for black people; they want injustice for white people. You are quite literally wishing that Rittenhouse were either killed on the scene or found guilty in spite of clear evidence of self-defense. For what? Because you think that's what would have happened to someone else? That doesn't fix a goddamn thing.
I'm fine. Thank you for asking.
One thing that baffles me in the sjw-79 era is Black people wanting places where white people can't go. (It is mentioned in those demands). I can't believe people think segregation is a good idea again.
Well he is a violent blood-thirsty murderer, after all. If he can't get puss, what hope is there for any of us?
I shouldn't care, but the predictable reaction by people doubling down on their anti-Rittenhouse takes might be the media/Twitter narrative that has bothered me the most of anything I can recall. It's perfectly normal to say he never should have been out there in the first place (even though it completely ignores the fact that neither should the fucking people he shot), and reasonable people can disagree about whether or not it should be legal to walk around the streets with a semi-automatic rifle. You're even entitled to think he was "looking for trouble" or whatever, even though it's total speculation and there's no way anyone can ever possibly know the truth of that.
But if you paid even the barest amount of attention to the trial, watched the videos of what happened and heard the tesitmony of the dude he shot and didn't kill, and you still insist on calling it "murder" then you are not a serious person. You made up your mind a year ago and no amount of evidence could ever convince you of something that is glaringly obvious from the videos - he only pulled the trigger when he felt he no longer had a choice.
And the racism angle just puts the cherry on top of the whole thing for me. If you say any version of, "If Kyle Rittenhouse were black..." I'm automatically ignoring whatever comes next. These people do not want "justice" for black people; they want injustice for white people. You are quite literally wishing that Rittenhouse were either killed on the scene or found guilty in spite of clear evidence of self-defense. For what? Because you think that's what would have happened to someone else? That doesn't fix a goddamn thing.
I'm fine. Thank you for asking.
One thing that baffles me in the sjw-79 era is Black people wanting places where white people can't go. (It is mentioned in those demands). I can't believe people think segregation is a good idea again.
There's always going to be the Marcus Garvey viewpoint. It's just that it's a lot easier to be loud with social media and the like.
One thing that baffles me in the sjw-79 era is Black people wanting places where white people can't go. (It is mentioned in those demands). I can't believe people think segregation is a good idea again.
There's always going to be the Marcus Garvey viewpoint. It's just that it's a lot easier to be loud with social media and the like.
There's always going to be the Marcus Garvey viewpoint. It's just that it's a lot easier to be loud with social media and the like.
Explain this to me like I'm me, please.
Marcus Garvey was one of the primary "back to Africa" guys who basically argued that blacks and whites shouldn't mix. Super against mixed race people and Jews. Balls' kind of dude.
Marcus Garvey was one of the primary "back to Africa" guys who basically argued that blacks and whites shouldn't mix. Super against mixed race people and Jews. Balls' kind of dude.
TY. I've heard the name before but couldn't recall why. Probably because Christopher Rufo won't let them teach history in schools.
Marcus Garvey was one of the primary "back to Africa" guys who basically argued that blacks and whites shouldn't mix. Super against mixed race people and Jews. Balls' kind of dude.
In my African American History class in college, the professor opened the class by asking his fellow blacks to raise their hands if they were willing to go back to Africa.
For those who raised their hand, he said, "Go ahead, but it's better here"
That was in the 80's mind you. Today, they'd have pitchforked him to death right there.
Isn't it a little racist to call it Black Friday? - Joy Behar
Marcus Garvey was one of the primary "back to Africa" guys who basically argued that blacks and whites shouldn't mix. Super against mixed race people and Jews. Balls' kind of dude.
In my African American History class in college, the professor opened the class by asking his fellow blacks to raise their hands if they were willing to go back to Africa.
For those who raised their hand, he said, "Go ahead, but it's better here"
That was in the 80's mind you. Today, they'd have pitchforked him to death right there.
Marcus Garvey was one of the primary "back to Africa" guys who basically argued that blacks and whites shouldn't mix. Super against mixed race people and Jews. Balls' kind of dude.
In my African American History class in college, the professor opened the class by asking his fellow blacks to raise their hands if they were willing to go back to Africa.
For those who raised their hand, he said, "Go ahead, but it's better here"
That was in the 80's mind you. Today, they'd have pitchforked him to death right there.
In my African American History class in college, the professor opened the class by asking his fellow blacks to raise their hands if they were willing to go back to Africa.
For those who raised their hand, he said, "Go ahead, but it's better here"
That was in the 80's mind you. Today, they'd have pitchforked him to death right there.
even back then seems like a risky move
I am guessing the professor is Black as UEM says the professor asked his fellow Blacks to raise their hands.
