I took it to mean that you believed that they picked Easter to troll people. I pointed out it's been the same date since it was created. What excuse am I making?
no, douche bag Biden went out of his way to highlight it to troll people he hates for a fake holiday that some clown made up in 2009
He posted it with 11 other proclamations on the White House website. Sure if that constitutes going out of his way.
And who does he hate? Isn’t Biden a practicing catholic?
he’s a joke. I can’t believe I have to argue how much that senile fuck and his party hates this country but more importantly regular people
Regular people don’t go on the White House website and wouldn’t know this had happened if it wasn’t for people who are professionally angry making noise about it online. There are plenty of reasons to hate Biden, but this is such a nothing burger.
if you don’t see it, no amount of words will explain it to you, or your neighbor who calls this a “nothing burger”
But nudge me and wake me up the next time a Muslim holiday falls on something and they ignore that to celebrate their woke bullshit
No idea what the hell you are talking about.
Did you get a Trump Bible? Funny how the Christians on the right aren’t all fake outraged about that.
I looked into this, because I WAS outraged about it. Doesn’t look like it has anything to do with him, nor is he profiting from it. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.
Did you get a Trump Bible? Funny how the Christians on the right aren’t all fake outraged about that.
I looked into this, because I WAS outraged about it. Doesn’t look like it has anything to do with him, nor is he profiting from it. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.
don’t let the facts get in the way of the left narrative
Here’s a sufficiently left wing article about it. It does say quote an unnamed person with some knowledge of the arrangement saying he’ll receive some royalties from it. Which, who knows. But this looks more like an endorsement rather than a business venture.
Here’s a sufficiently left wing article about it. It does say quote an unnamed person with some knowledge of the arrangement saying he’ll receive some royalties from it. Which, who knows. But this looks more like an endorsement rather than a business venture.
”The New York Times reports that “according to a person familiar” (classic) Trump will receive royalties from sales.”
If you feel that’s enough to go on, then yes. I hope we find out for sure one way or the other. But for now, that quote isn’t much to go on. If you’re familiar with media these days.
”The New York Times reports that “according to a person familiar” (classic) Trump will receive royalties from sales.”
If you feel that’s enough to go on, then yes. I hope we find out for sure one way or the other. But for now, that quote isn’t much to go on. If you’re familiar with media these days.
anytime the NYT has someone who refuses to go on record involving Trump you KNOW it’s true
REGARDLESS, I think we can all agree that both of these candidates are morally bankrupt geriatrics who do or say whatever they think gets them votes, and thereby power.
REGARDLESS, I think we can all agree that both of these candidates are morally bankrupt geriatrics who do or say whatever they think gets them votes, and thereby power.