The number of people who are pure pro-life (no abortion, regardless of circumstance) is extremely small, like 75-25 or something like that. So, it depends on where on the scale you decide to actually say where the line is. Restrictions on health of the mother? Restrictions on rape or incest? My guess is that [no abortion ever plus only if mother's life is at risk] is approximately equal to [abortions for rape and incest victims plus abortions for everyone!]
You know, the media entity that just recently played audio of an actual abortion? Yeah, they're likely right down the middle, no bias there.
that linked article is incredibly disturbing. The people involved in that abortion compared it to giving birth? Sick fucks man. I ain't saying abortion should be illegal, but after you suck a baby out of a woman to kill the baby, you probably shouldn't be laughing.
The number of people who are pure pro-life (no abortion, regardless of circumstance) is extremely small, like 75-25 or something like that. So, it depends on where on the scale you decide to actually say where the line is. Restrictions on health of the mother? Restrictions on rape or incest? My guess is that [no abortion ever plus only if mother's life is at risk] is approximately equal to [abortions for rape and incest victims plus abortions for everyone!]
It's been nearly 50-50 with slight variations for fifty years.
SCOTUS pushes the decision to the state level, media hammers it, number jumps to 55-40 and we can't figure out that it's likely a temporary shift?
Isn't it a little racist to call it Black Friday? - Joy Behar
The number of people who are pure pro-life (no abortion, regardless of circumstance) is extremely small, like 75-25 or something like that. So, it depends on where on the scale you decide to actually say where the line is. Restrictions on health of the mother? Restrictions on rape or incest? My guess is that [no abortion ever plus only if mother's life is at risk] is approximately equal to [abortions for rape and incest victims plus abortions for everyone!]
It's been nearly 50-50 with slight variations for fifty years.
SCOTUS pushes the decision to the state level, media hammers it, number jumps to 55-40 and we can't figure out that it's likely a temporary shift?
how dare you try to bring nuance or anything to this discussion. Don't look at quotes from the NPR article like "The poll found the highest pro-choice affiliation that Gallup has measured since 1995, when 56% of Americans identified as such. That number had fluctuated between 45% and 50% for the past decade before jumping six points in the latest survey." Just fuck off. That's how you sway people and present an argument. "Fuck off." Rolls off the tongue perfectly.
Post by bigjohnstudd on Jan 26, 2023 1:30:16 GMT -5
Remember when 30 for 30 debuted, and the premise was the untold stories adjacent to famous events. But then it turned out, people just wanted regular old documentaries. I bet this show ends up like that. The first 2 or 3 shows will be unique, and then by about week four it's just the most mundane stuff ever.
Dropped YoutubeTV for the summer. I think about doing it every year but it's just not worth it to me to pay $70/month for an hour of playoff basketball/hockey at night.
