Credit where credit is due. Don Lemon with a reasonable take:
The officer faced swift rebuke by some liberal pundits, including LeBron James, for his use of deadly force, but Lemon defended the officer Wednesday night, noting that he was doing his job.
“People are anguished watching another video like this, and I get it. But even in our anguish, we cannot abandon the responsibility we have to be fair. And even while our hearts are hurting, we have to judge each incident based on what we see and the facts we know,” Lemon said."They roll up on the scene. They see people tussling around. Someone has a knife, and their job is to protect and serve every life on that scene. If they see someone who is in the process of taking a life, what is that decision, what decision do they have to make?" he added. "The other person’s life was in imminent danger. As you know, from the hostile environment training that we get on this job, and because of our proximity to law enforcement, that at a certain distance, a stabbing, a knife, can be much more lethal than a bullet. Especially if you get stabbed in the artery in the temple, somewhere that you’re going to bleed out.
Lemon, in reference to people who said the officer shouldn't have used lethal force, said that "Tasers don't always connect."
I disagree with the pull quote in the tweet, but I'm sure she bags on Pelosi/Biden/et al for interjecting themselves and I agree with her on all that. My time is much too valuable to watch the full 6 minute clip obviously.
I didn't watch any of the trial obviously because I value my time, so I can't say for sure whether it was actually fair. But I agree with her basic premise, which was that the media and Maxine Waters made it abundantly clear that a not guilty verdict was going to result in cities on fire. I don't know how sequestering and such actually works, but I just can't imagine the jury not knowing that. I have no idea if/how it would have actually impacted their verdict, mainly because I don't know what evidence they were presented with. But the whole thing sure felt like a media circus with a foregone conclusion. I happen to think it was the right conclusion, but I'm also OK with thinking maybe it wasn't a "fair trial".
I don't think the politician statements mattered that much to the jury. They were all drawn in from the Minneapolis area, they literally saw the riots after he was killed, none of them were seated on the jury with any belief that their verdict would not be a huge deal. If there is going to be any success on appeal, IMO, the far more likely successful tactic would be to go after the Judge's decision not to change venue or continue the trial right after the city announced they had settled the civil suit regarding his death. In the eyes of the Court, I suspect that will imply guilt much more strongly than Politician A spouting off.
My biggest problem with Owens saying he didn't get a fair trial? I can't find a single Google result to her saying that he didn't receive a fair trial until after a verdict came down that she didn't agree with. She wasn't on Tucker's show on Monday night saying "No matter what happens here, he was treated unfairly." That's not just an Owens problem, obviously everyone is going to be hypocritical about it, but she only became outraged when it wasn't a result she wanted.
I disagree with the pull quote in the tweet, but I'm sure she bags on Pelosi/Biden/et al for interjecting themselves and I agree with her on all that. My time is much too valuable to watch the full 6 minute clip obviously.
I didn't watch any of the trial obviously because I value my time, so I can't say for sure whether it was actually fair. But I agree with her basic premise, which was that the media and Maxine Waters made it abundantly clear that a not guilty verdict was going to result in cities on fire. I don't know how sequestering and such actually works, but I just can't imagine the jury not knowing that. I have no idea if/how it would have actually impacted their verdict, mainly because I don't know what evidence they were presented with. But the whole thing sure felt like a media circus with a foregone conclusion. I happen to think it was the right conclusion, but I'm also OK with thinking maybe it wasn't a "fair trial".
The jury was not sequestered until deliberations
Isn't it a little racist to call it Black Friday? - Joy Behar